Category Archives: spam

FireEye’s Ozdok Botnet Takedown Observed

FireEye coordinated a takedown of botnet Ozdok or MegaD, on 5-6 Nov 2009, with cooperation by many ISPs and DNS registrars.

Good show! What effects did it have on spam? Not just spam from this botnet; spam in general.

Botnets and spam volume

This graph was presented at NANOG 48, Austin, TX, 24 Feb 2010, in FireEye’s Ozdok Botnet Takedown In Spam Blocklists and Volume Observed by IIAR Project, CREC, UT Austin. John S. Quarterman, Quarterman Creations, Prof. Andrew Whinston, PI CREC, UT Austin. That was a snapshot of an ongoing project, Incentives, Insurance and Audited Reputation: An Economic Approach to Controlling Spam (IIAR).

That presentation was enough to demonstrate the main point: takedowns are good, but we need a lot more of them and a lot more coordinated if we are to make a real dent in spam.

The IIAR project will keep drilling down in the data and building up models. One goal is to build a reputation system to show how effective takedowns and other anti-spam measures are, on which ASNs.

Thanks especially to CBL and to Team Cymru for very useful data, and to FireEye for a successful takedown.

We’re all ears for further takedowns to examine.

-jsq

3FN + FTC = Some Less Spam From Some ASNs

A research project I’m assisting at the University of Texas at Austin notes that:
On Tuesday 2 June 2009, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) took legal steps that shut down the web hosting provider Triple Fiber network (3FN.net).
2009-06-01--cbl-2.png

Looking at Autonomous Systems (ASNs) listed in the spam blocklist CBL, Continue reading →

VZ Port 587: Good Try

Back in February, Verizon announced it would start requiring outbound mail go through port 587 instead of port 25 during the next few months. It seemed like a good idea to squelch spam. Most other major ISPs did it. People applauded Verizon for doing it.

Unfortunately, it seems that if it had any effect it was short-lived. Looking at anti-spam blocklists on a daily basis, a couple of Verizon Autonomous Systems (ASes), AS-19262 and AS-701, do show dips in blocklist listings on the blocklist PSBL in March. But they don’t last.

Spammers are very adaptable, partly because the botnets they use are adaptable. Good try, Verizon.

This information is from an NSF-funded academic research project at the University of Texas at Austin business school. Thanks to PSBL for the blocklist data.

-jsq

Windows Considered Not Ready for the Desktop

R. McDougall takes the high ground for open software:
0. Premise: free and open software will stay indefinitely. Full stop. You may argue eternally, but free software is the ultimate disruptive technology, moving up from the low ground, replacing complicated and ill-fitting proprietary alternatives at every turn, such as web-browsers, e-mail clients, video players, office software, etc., which at one point cost money, but now most people find that they can no longer justify spending money to buy an upgrade for more “Clippy the Happy Assistant”. Proprietary software will only be able to stay relevant by searching out ever more niche applications, or by massive expenditure on research in high-end applications for which it will take time for the ideas and algorithms to filter down to the greater community, and thus a brief window of profitability will remain. Software patents are nothing but a destructive force to retard innovation, and with more and more of the technology and legal communities realizing this basic fact, software patents are about to go away forever.
I think he’s being a bit optimistic about software patents, but no more so than Windows advocates claiming that open software is a flash in the pan. Then he gets into the undeniable stuff, chief of which is:
1.1 History’s greatest playground for malicious software. With unpatched machines on the internet taking only minutes to become infested with viruses, or become a slave bot for massive illegal spamming operations, Windows is a blight on the Internet’s infrastructure.
And it keeps getting better. He says he wrote it just as a game, but it pretty much spells out why I don’t use Windows, plus why Windows is a menace to the Internet.

Fast Flux Mapped

ffcrop.png Australian HoneyNet tracks Fast Flux nodes and maps them:
Below is the current locations of the storm Fast Flux hosts. This is updated every 15 minutes from our database.

I Had to change it to only show the last 6 hours of new nodes since GoogleMaps doesn't scale very well when your reaching past a few thousand markers on a map 🙂

—Fast Flux Tracking, Australian HoneyNet Project, accessed 7 Aug 2008

Fast Flux, in case you're not familiar with it, refers to various techniques used by bot herders, spammers, phishers, and the like to evade blocking by rapidly changing which IP addresses are mapped to which domain names.

-jsq

Loopholes Closed by FTC in CAN-SPAM Act Rules

The U.S. FTC has updated its regulations regarding the CAN-SPAM Act (PDF) to require:
(1) an e-mail recipient cannot be required to pay a fee, provide information other than his or her e-mail address and opt-out preferences, or take any steps other than sending a reply e-mail message or visiting a single Internet Web page to opt out of receiving future e-mail from a sender;

(2) the definition of “sender” was modified to make it easier to determine which of multiple parties advertising in a single e-mail message is responsible for complying with the Act’s opt-out requirements;

(3) a “sender” of commercial e-mail can include an accurately-registered post office box or private mailbox established under United States Postal Service regulations to satisfy the Act’s requirement that a commercial e-mail display a “valid physical postal address”; and

(4) a definition of the term “person” was added to clarify that CAN-SPAM’s obligations are not limited to natural persons.

— FTC Approves New Rule Provision Under The CAN-SPAM Act, Press Release, FTC, May 12, 2008

These changes appear to tighten up what is required of marketers; they have to say who they are and they can’t weasel out by claiming a corporation is not a person.

However, it’s not clear to me why it’s opt-out that’s required; why not opt-in? I never trust a spammer to process an opt-out; I assume they’re just collecting more addresses. Plus the spammer still has ten days to process opt-out requests.

-jsq

Outsourced Blog Spam

After outsourcing call centers, rote financial work, and programming, why not comment spam? This reporter’s blog comment filter was working, yet:
…so far it’s stopped 10,000 spams while allowing 377 human comments. So why had this got through? The electronic trail explained: the “captcha” (Completely Automated Public Turing test to tell Computers and Humans Apart) had been filled in.

The captcha is the junk filter’s last resort. Because it’s easy and cheap to program machines to post any sort of junk on blogs, a captcha (which puts numbers or letters in an image, which a machine in theory can’t read) shows whether you’ve got a real live person giving their thoughts, or just a dumb machine trying to up some spammer’s search-engine ranking.

If the captcha was filled in, it must have been done by a person; if it had been done by a machine, the spammers would have cracked the problem of solving captchas and would be busily spamming every blog they could find.

The price of humans who’ll spam blogs is falling to zero, Charles Arthur, The Guardian Thursday November 23, 2006

Who dunnit? Continue reading →