Many of you are concerned as am I about our friend who
has been hauled into court in London and unfairly
maligned for the “crime” of distributing some government
communications that he got from an anonymous source.
I know our friend also has been a bit playful out of wedlock,
and even had a son that way, but I don’t see what that
has to do with the matter at hand.
Our friend represented his agency in the matter of procuring
and forwarding the communications
“as a public act, dealing with the public correspondence of public men.”
His accusers were having none of it:
Into what companies will the fabricator of this iniquity hereafter go with
an unembarrassed face, or with any semblance of the honest intrepidity
of virtue?
Men will watch him with a jealous eye &em; they will hide their papers from him,
and lock up their escritoires.
Having hitherto aspired after fame by his writings,
he will henceforth esteem it a libel to be called
a man of letters…
His accusers made him out to be a vindictive destroyer of public confidence.
He had
“forfeited all the respect of societies and of men” and was not
a gentleman, rather a common thief.
I am happy to hear our friend has been released by the court in London,
although
two days later he was fired from his job as
deputy postmaster general of North America.
Continue reading →
