Interesting article here about difficulties of switching end users from Windows to Linux:
Six months later," 80% of users have and had no problem with OpenOffice," Holt said.
Unfortunately, the other 20% have fouled the nest. One had some minor issues with a table inserted into a document and others reported number of everyday formatting issues. This vocal minority has rebelled against OpenOffice.
The OpenOffice migration is floundering, as, once again, some employees have returned to using MS Word.
Microsoft’s mindshare with some employees has been harder to overcome than the problems with the table and formatting. Holt now knows that the success of an OpenOffice migration can depend on early identification and deprogramming of employees who are fiercely loyal to MS Office. "Just one person like this may upset the whole project," he said.
Two ways Microsoft sabotages Linux desktop adoption,
By Jan Stafford,
09 Feb 2006, SearchOpenSource.com
The article has a number of specific tidbits about problems encountered, and some speculations about
how many of these problems are orchestrated by Microsoft, either directly through impeding OEMs from
supplying anything else, or indirectly by convincing users that only Microsoft is good enough.
That latter reminds me of the old days, when nobody ever went wrong by buying IBM.
And it reminds me of something else I just read.
Continue reading →