Category Archives: IT Security

Ogee snowshoe: black swan or new strategy? SpamRankings.net

A week ago you may recall most of March’s crop of Ogee spamming ASNs had subsided. Yet there were some contenders coming up from the bottom right corner of the graph.

Some correspondents say snowshoe spamming such as Ogee is a black swan, unanticipated and short-lived. I say it may be a change in strategy. Others say the actual spam coming out of Ogee is not the same campaigns as we’ve seen from botnets, so spammers are not moving over. To which I say: yet. And if snowshoe spam is big enough to change worldwide SpamRankings.net, and if it continues, that’s a strategy change. We’ll see how all that goes.

Meanwhile, what’s happened in the last week or two?

Top 10 ASNs showing Ogee spam 2012-03-01 to 2012-04-25, SpamRankings.net.

A few of those contenders were just flashes in the pan. But others are still spamming increasingly more.

-jsq

eCrime Summit in Prague 25-27 April 2012

These ecrime meetings are always interesting and useful. -jsq

Press release of 29 March:

Containing the Global Cybercrime Threat is Focus of Counter eCrime Operations Summit (CeCOS VI) in Prague, April 25-27

CeCOS VI, in Prague, Czech Republic, to focus on harmonizing operational issues, cybercrime data exchange, and industrial policies to strengthen and unify the global counter-ecrime effort.

CAMBRIDGE, Mass.—(BUSINESS WIRE)—The 6th annual Counter eCrime Operations Summit (CeCOS VI) will convene in Prague, Czech Republic, April 25-27, 2012, as the APWG gathers global leaders from the financial services, technology, government, law enforcement, communications sectors, and research centers to define common goals and harmonize resources to strengthen the global counter-cybercrime effort.

CeCOS VI Prague will review the development of response systems and resources available to counter-cybercrime managers and forensic professionals from around the world.

Specific goals of this high-level, multi-national conference are to identify common forensic needs, in terms of the data, tools, and communications protocols required to harmonize cybercrime response across borders and between private sector financial and industrial sector responders and public sector policy professionals and law enforcement.

Key presentations will include:

Continue reading →

Which ASNs showed most Ogee snowshoe spam in March and early April?

Snowshoe spamming begins to look like a rising tide.

Peaking at the end of March 2012, the Ogee snowshoe spam winner is AS 16226 GNAXNET-AS – Global Net Access LLC. GNAXNet actually placed another Autonomous System in the same time frame, AS 3595.

U.S. Brinkster’s AS 33055 BCC-65-182-96-0-PHX finally cleaned up its act and went to zero Ogee volume 11 April 2012. Canada’s AS 32613 IWeb also went to zero on 23 March 2012.

On the other hand, it looks like a new surge of snowshoe spam is starting mid-April, including some organizations maybe not usually considered hosting companies, such as Cogent’s AS 174.

Meanwhile, Belarus’ AS 6697 BELPAK-AS already went from #7 to #5 worldwide in March, pushing Belarus up from #16 to #12 among countries.

And NOC’s AS 21788 keeps on rolling waves of snowshoe spam.

All these volume numbers and rankings are provisional, especially considering we’re seeing so many ASes and netblocks that were previously not spamming that we’re tuning our database to be sure we’re properly accounting for them all.

Nonetheless, it looks like snowshoe may be a rising spamming strategy.

-jsq

Ogee pushed iWeb and Canada up SpamRankings.net in March 2012

AS 32613 IWEB-AS was far ahead of the Canadian spamming pack in the March 2012 SpamRankings.net. iWeb improved a lot towards the end of the month, but will it stay improved? AS 14366 MTNCABLE plateaued early, dropped, then took first at the end of the month. Could they have the same problem?

Why yes, both iWeb and MTNCABLE appear to be infested by Ogee snowshoe spamming.

This problem is bad enough that Canada rose from country #46 in January to #34 in February and #25 in March. You can’t see that on the countries top 10, like you can for the U.S., which snowshoe spamming pushed to #1 worldwide in March, but internally SpamRankings.net keeps track of rankings of all countries worldwide, and indeed Canada went form #46 in January to #25 in March.

-jsq

Snowshoe spamming pushed the U.S. to #1 worldwide in March 2012 SpamRankings.net

Previously unseen Brinkster’s AS 33055 BCC-65-182-96-0-PHX took first place. AS 10439 CARINET leapt from #8 last month to #4 for March for the U.S., and was up to second place at the end of the month. Six ASNs joined the U.S. top 10: were they all due to snowshoe spam, too? Brinkster was so bad it made #8 on the world top 10!

Last month’s winner AS 21788 NOC finally cleaned up its act a bit, dropping from #1 to #5. Six ASNs dropped out of the top 10. Four of them (Webhost-ASN-1, LIMESTONENETWORKS, PEER1, and ATMLINK) popped to the top 10 last month due to snowshoe spam. The other two (NTT and Charter’s ASNs) didn’t even have to spam less to drop out, because this month’s top 10 had so much more spam.

But the US ASNs that got worse pushed the U.S. to #1 spamming country. The slope of that U.S. world top 10 curve for the last dozen days of March looks just like the Brinkster and CARINET ASN curves in the U.S. top 10. Very impressive, to drive the whole country into the countries top 10!

-jsq

 

 

Did snowshoe spamming cause the big February spam surge?

It turns out the source of the big spam surge that rocketed eight ASNs

Rank
(Previous)		 ASN
1 (9) AS 21788 NOC
2 (-) AS 27229 WEBHOST-ASN1
3 (-) AS 46475 LIMESTONENETWORKS
4 (-) AS 33055 BCC-65-182-96-0-PHX
6 (5) AS 15149 EZZI-101-BGP
7 (-) AS 13768 PEER1
8 (-) AS 10439 CARINET
9 (-) AS 7796 ATMLINK
to the top of the U.S. February 2012 SpamRankings.net was not a botnet: it was apparently snowshoe spamming. Here are the most-affected eight U.S. ASNs again, with their rankings for February, listed in the table on the right.

So, Ogee is not a botnet; it is a collection of IP addresses apparently involved in snowshoe spam. It’s also not new. Ogee is just a specific set of snowshoe addresses. But what is snowshoe spam?

Paul Roberts wrote for ThreatPost 6 October 2011, Expert: Eight Years Later, ‘Snowshoe Spam’ Suggests CAN SPAM Not Working,

Brett Cove, a researcher for anti malware firm Sophos, told attendees at the annual Virus Bulletin Conference on Thursday that so-called “snowshoe spam” is becoming a bigger problem, even as spam e-mail volumes associated with botnets are receding. Snowshoe spam is responsible for the bulk of spam messages that make it past anti spam filters at U.S. firms, even as bulk senders avoid prosecution by adhering to the letter of the U.S. CAN SPAM anti-spamming law.

Snowshoe spam isn’t a new problem. In fact, within anti spam circles, researchers have been talking about the phenomenon for years. The term “snowshoe” spam comes from the tactic of spreading the load of spam runs across a wide range of IP addresses as a way to avoid detection by anti spam filters, in the same way that snowshoes spread the weight of their wearer across a wide area to avoid breaking through snow and ice.

Anti spam filters are typically programmed to allow only a small volume of identical e-mail messages from the same IP address range, Cove told Threatpost. Snowshoe spam is able to avoid—or postpone—the filters by sending mail from a range of addresses, often leased by the bulk mail senders, he said.

That may sound a lot like low-and-slow botnet spamming, but there are five key differences:

Continue reading →