Regarding Blogger Civility,
I’d like to add that where there are real threats, of course the person
threatened should complain, and if the threatener can be tracked down,
there are already laws that apply.
Also, some people think that technical subjects aren’t contentious
enough to provoke threats; those people apparently haven’t yet
gotten crazy rants from people who incorporate technology into
their conspiracy theories, or who fear technology because it
might help people oppose their favorite policies,
or who don’t like technology because they’ve always been afraid
of people who understand it,
or who don’t like women/gays/blacks/whites/southerners/foreigners/whatever
participating in it.
And there are people who think the blogosphere is unusual in harboring threats;
those people apparently don’t get out much.
I wonder what sort of mail somebody like Condoleeza Rice or Hillary Clinton
or Barack Obama or John McCain gets?
Anyway, the idea of a blogger code of conduct reminds me of something else:
A technique to detect favorable and unfavorable opinions toward specific subjects (such as organizations and their products) within large numbers of documents offers enormous opportunities for various applications. It would provide powerful functionality for competitive analysis, marketing analysis, and detection of unfavorable rumors for risk management.
— Overview, Sentiment Analysis, IBM Tokyo Research Lab, accessed 13 April 2007
Yet another artificial intelligence scheme; ho hum. Or is it?
Continue reading